A blockchain is a distributed ledger that records data across a network of nodes. However, not all blockchains are the same. Depending on who can read from, write to, and control the network, blockchains fall into three main types: public, private, and consortium. In addition, hybrid blockchains seek to combine the advantages of different types of traditional blockchains into a single system.
In this lesson, you'll break down each type of blockchain. You'll discover how each serves a unique purpose, from decentralized finance (DeFi) to secure enterprise operations. This lesson goes beyond simple definitions, teaching you to describe how different blockchain systems are structured and governed with precision and confidence. Master the core vocabulary developers and companies use, including permissioned vs. permissionless networks, Sybil resistance, decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), and more.
🔓 Public Blockchains: Open and Transparent
A public blockchain is permissionless, meaning anyone can join the network, validate transactions, and view the ledger. These blockchains are designed to be decentralized in both technical architecture and governance, relying on Sybil resistance mechanisms like Proof of Work (PoW) or Proof of Stake (PoS), combined with consensus protocols such as Nakamoto-style consensus or Gasper, to maintain network security and agreement.
In simple terms: Public chains are open, transparent, and not controlled by one person or group. They use built-in coins (tokens) to reward people for keeping the network safe.
Key Characteristics:
Open participation: Anyone can run a node, submit transactions, or deploy smart contracts
Transparency: All data is publicly visible and verifiable
Decentralization: No single entity controls the network's governance or technical infrastructure
Token-based economy: Native cryptocurrencies (e.g., ETH for Ethereum) incentivize honest behavior
Trustless operation: Participants don't need to trust each other, only the underlying cryptographic protocols
Examples:
Ethereum – a general-purpose smart contract platform powering DeFi, non-fungible tokens (NFTs), and DAOs
Bitcoin – the original blockchain network, designed for decentralized peer-to-peer currency
Solana – a high-performance chain focused on speed and low transaction fees
Use Cases:
DeFi – open financial services like lending, borrowing, and trading without intermediaries
NFTs – digital ownership of art, collectibles, and assets
Open-source protocols – decentralized apps and services anyone can use or contribute to
Borderless payments – global money transfers without banks or third parties
🔒 Private Blockchains: Fast, Secure, and Controlled
A private blockchain is permissioned and typically controlled by a single organization. Access is restricted to invited participants. These blockchains prioritize privacy, speed, and governance control. They often use different consensus mechanisms than public chains and centralize governance while potentially maintaining technical distribution across multiple nodes.
In simple terms: Private blockchains are controlled by one company or group. Only invited people can use them. They’re faster and more private than public ones.
Key Characteristics:
Restricted access: Only authorized users can read or write to the ledger
Centralized governance: A single entity manages permissions, updates, and network rules
Higher performance: Faster throughput and lower latency due to fewer nodes and alternative consensus mechanisms (such as Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance or even centralized validation)
Data confidentiality: Internal transactions are hidden from the public
Trust-based model: Participants trust the controlling organization, relying more on organizational trust than decentralized consensus
Examples:
Hyperledger Fabric – an open-source, enterprise-grade blockchain framework (hosted by the Linux Foundation) used for supply chain and identity systems by companies like Walmart
R3 Corda – often categorized as a blockchain platform; designed for regulated financial institutions, focusing on secure, private data sharing and contract settlement
Use Cases:
Enterprise supply chains – tracking goods and verifying origin in closed industrial ecosystems
Internal asset tracking – monitoring and auditing digital assets within a single company
Financial settlement between known parties – like interbank transfers where privacy is essential
Healthcare record systems – securely managing sensitive patient data with strict access control
🧩 Consortium Blockchains: A Balance of Control
A consortium blockchain is also permissioned, but control is shared between multiple trusted organizations instead of one central authority. This design balances efficiency with shared governance, making it suitable for industry-wide collaboration while maintaining privacy from external parties.
In simple terms: Consortium blockchains are shared by a group of trusted companies. They work together to manage the system. It’s more private than public chains, but less controlled than private ones.
Key Characteristics:
Group control: Multiple entities (e.g., banks, logistics firms) jointly manage the network
Semi-decentralized: More decentralized than private chains but less than public ones, with governance distributed among consortium members
Flexible design: Participants can agree on custom consensus rules and permission structures
Improved coordination: Streamlines operations between competitors or partners
Selective transparency: Typically transparent within the consortium but opaque to outsiders
Examples:
ConsenSys Quorum – an enterprise-focused blockchain platform (originally developed by JPMorgan) used for finance and compliance-sensitive environments
Energy Web Chain - consortium for energy sector coordination
Use Cases:
Cross-bank settlements – speeding up fund transfers between institutions while preserving compliance
Trade finance networks – managing documents and workflows between importers, exporters, and banks
Supply chain collaboration – sharing data between multiple companies in a supply chain while maintaining competitive privacy
Insurance claims processing – automating trust and verification across insurers and reinsurers
⚖️ Comparison Summary
Feature | Public Blockchain | Private Blockchain | Consortium Blockchain |
|---|---|---|---|
Access | Open to anyone | Restricted to authorized users | Restricted to consortium members |
Governance | Decentralized | Centralized (single entity) | Shared among member organizations |
Speed & Scalability | Slower due to consensus overhead | Faster with streamlined consensus | Moderate speed with multi-party consensus |
Transparency | Fully transparent to all | Confidential to organization | Transparent within consortium, private externally |
Trust Model | Trustless (trust in protocol) | Trust-based (trust in controlling entity) | Partially trust-based (trust among known parties) |
Consensus | PoW or PoS with public consensus protocols | Centralized approval or protocols like PBFT | Custom BFT-style consensus among trusted members |
The information we have covered so far has focused solely on explicit types of chains. However, there is a fourth type that has begun to emerge.
🔀 Hybrid Blockchains: Best of Both Worlds
Hybrid blockchains combine features of both public and private blockchains, aiming to provide the transparency of public systems while maintaining the security and controlled access of private ones. They allow organizations to decide what information should be shared publicly and what should remain confidential, making them especially attractive for industries that need both trust and privacy.
In simple terms: It’s like having a company with both a private office (restricted access) and a public lobby (open to everyone). You control what stays internal and what becomes public.
Key Characteristics:
Controlled access with selective public visibility
Permission-based private system alongside permissionless public elements
Reduces disadvantages while maximizing benefits of both types
Organizations manage data flow between private and public layers
Examples:
IBM Food Trust: Combines private supply chain data with public product verification
Dragonchain: A hybrid blockchain framework allowing businesses to keep sensitive data private while interacting with public blockchains when needed
Use Cases:
Supply chain transparency (public product verification, private business processes)
Healthcare (public health data, private patient records)
Government services (public transparency, private citizen data)
❓ Q&A: Your Questions Answered
Q: What's the main difference between a "permissioned" and "permissionless" network?
A: This is the most important distinction. A permissionless blockchain is a free-for-all; anyone can join, view, and participate without needing approval. Think of it as a public park. In contrast, a permissioned blockchain requires you to have an invitation or approval to join. It's like a private club or a company's internal network. Private and consortium blockchains are permissioned, while public blockchains are permissionless.
Q: Which type of blockchain is best for my business?
A: It depends entirely on your goals. If your business needs transparency, decentralization, and wants to create an open platform for a global community, a public blockchain is a good fit. If you need privacy, high speed, and a controlled environment to manage internal data or collaborate with a few known partners, a private or consortium blockchain is likely the better choice. Many companies now use hybrid blockchains to get the best of both worlds, keeping sensitive data private while using the public chain for verification.
Q: How can I compare all four blockchain types with a simple analogy?
A: Imagine a group of people keeping a shared record book.
A public blockchain is like a ledger in a town square where anyone can write in it and check every entry.
A private blockchain is like a ledger in one company's office that only its employees can use and see.
A consortium blockchain is like a shared ledger in a building owned by a few different companies. Only their employees can use it, and they all work together to maintain it.
A hybrid blockchain is like that same shared building, but with a public window in the lobby where anyone can look in and verify that something was written, without being able to see all the details inside.
📢 Key Takeaways
Public Blockchains are open, transparent, and decentralized networks where anyone can participate. They prioritize censorship resistance and trustlessness, but are often slower and more expensive. Examples: Bitcoin and Ethereum.
Private Blockchains are controlled by a single entity and require permission to join. They prioritize speed, efficiency, and data privacy, making them ideal for internal enterprise use. Example: Hyperledger Fabric.
Consortium Blockchains are governed by a group of trusted organizations, balancing decentralization with control. They are perfect for industry-wide collaborations where shared privacy is needed. Example: ConsenSys Quorum.
Hybrid Blockchains combine the features of public and private chains to get the best of both worlds. They allow organizations to maintain privacy for sensitive data while leveraging the transparency of a public blockchain. Example: Dragonchain.
The choice of a blockchain type is a fundamental trade-off between decentralization and control.
🏆 Complete the Lesson
You've just completed a deep dive into the different types of blockchains. The next step is to solidify your new knowledge.
Test your understanding and see how much you've learned.



